AI search — ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews, and Copilot — now drives a meaningful share of research traffic. But traditional SEO tools weren't built to measure whether these engines cite your brand. A new category emerged in 2024–2025 specifically to track this: some tools are AI-only specialists, some bolt AI onto legacy SEO, and one or two try to do both well. We tested seven of them across the same brand-visibility workflow, rated them by transparency of pricing, breadth of engine coverage, and how actionable the output actually is. Here's the honest ranking, updated for September 2026.
How we ranked
Engine coverage: does it track the top 5 AI engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, AIO, Copilot)?
Actionability: does it tell you what to change, or just what's happening?
Pricing transparency: are prices published, or is every quote custom?
Trial / free tier: can you evaluate before signing a contract?
Setup friction: five-minute self-serve, or a demo + sales cycle?
#1
Profound
Price: From $499/mo (Growth) · enterprise plans on quote
Best for: Enterprise brand teams tracking share-of-voice across thousands of prompts.
Strengths
Deepest enterprise reporting — per-prompt drill-downs across LLMs and Google AI Overviews.
Strong sentiment + source analysis, comparable to what a large marketing analytics team would build in-house.
Broad engine coverage, including Copilot and long-tail agents.
Weaknesses
Genuinely expensive. Solo founders and agencies under $10K MRR will find it out of reach.
AI-only — no traditional SEO features (audits, keyword research, rank tracking).
No self-serve trial; you have to go through a sales conversation.
Verdict
If you're an enterprise brand team with a real budget for AI-search analytics and you don't need any traditional SEO functionality (because you already have Ahrefs or Semrush), Profound is the deepest tool in the category. The reporting alone justifies the price for teams whose share-of-voice in AI answers moves real revenue.
Best for: Marketing teams who already have SEO covered and want a clean dedicated AI visibility dashboard.
Strengths
One of the more polished UIs in the category — focused, uncluttered, easy to train a team on.
Solid prompt-level insights and sentiment tracking across the top engines.
Reasonable pricing gap between tiers — clear upgrade path.
Weaknesses
No SEO features. If you don't already have Ahrefs or Semrush, you'll pay double.
Some prompt limits at the lower tiers can bite if you have a large brand catalog.
AI Advisor is generic; doesn't know your site's actual data.
Verdict
If you value polish and focus, and AI-visibility tracking will genuinely be one of several tools in your stack, AthenaHQ is a strong pick. It's what you'd recommend to someone who says "I want an AI-search dashboard and nothing else on the same screen."
Best for: Founders and agencies who want AI-search AND full traditional SEO in one tool.
Strengths
AI-search tracking (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, AIO, Copilot) IS included in Pro — no add-on tier.
Full traditional SEO stack: site audit, keyword research, rank tracking, backlinks — all in the same $89.
AI Advisor is grounded in your project's actual audit issues, keyword targets and rank history — not generic answers.
AI writes the fix, not just the diagnosis — Expert tier generates the actual copy/schema/internal-link updates.
Weaknesses
Enterprise governance (SSO, audit logs, dedicated CSM) not on Pro — Studio/Agency required.
AI-only UX is broader than pure specialists — some teams prefer the focus of AthenaHQ or Otterly.
Newer platform than Profound or Ahrefs; some deep-cut enterprise features are still on the roadmap.
Verdict
Full disclosure: Outerank is our tool. It's here at #3 because for the specific narrow question of "best AI-search dashboard," specialist tools (Profound, AthenaHQ) may edge us out on pure depth or UI focus. But if the honest question is "best tool to run both AI-search AND traditional SEO on one $89 subscription," Outerank is the strongest pick on this list. We built it for exactly this combined workflow.
#4
Otterly.ai
Price: $29–249/mo
Best for: Small teams testing AI visibility on a tight budget.
Strengths
Lite plan at $29/mo is the cheapest legitimate entry point in the category.
Focused UI — no traditional-SEO clutter.
Prompt-level share-of-voice works well at the price point.
Weaknesses
No traditional SEO. You'll need a second tool for the rest.
Some depth limitations show up when you scale to enterprise-volume prompts.
Verdict
A pragmatic AI-only pick when you're deciding "do I even need to track this yet?" The $29 tier lets you get real signal without committing to enterprise pricing. Just budget for a second SEO tool later, or you'll grow out of it.
Best for: Teams who want a step up from Otterly's Lite tier but aren't ready for Profound.
Strengths
Clean AI-only dashboard.
Solid engine coverage across the top 5.
Reasonable feature set at the Starter tier.
Weaknesses
AI-only, so you'll stack it on top of an SEO tool.
AI Advisor is generic.
Verdict
Peec sits comfortably between Otterly and AthenaHQ. If you tested Otterly and outgrew it, Peec is often the next step teams try before eventually deciding whether they want to consolidate into a broader platform.
Best for: Teams evaluating multiple AI-visibility specialists for the same job.
Strengths
Newer entrant with an actively developed roadmap.
Focused feature set.
Price band competitive with Peec and Otterly.
Weaknesses
Fewer years in market means smaller sample size for feature depth.
No SEO features.
Verdict
RankScale is a legitimate option to shortlist alongside Peec and Otterly. If you're methodically evaluating three or four specialist tools, it deserves a slot in that test.
Price: $50–250/mo add-on (on top of Ahrefs Lite $129 or Standard $249)
Best for: Teams already on Ahrefs who want AI visibility without switching platforms.
Strengths
If you're already on Ahrefs, adding Brand Radar is the least friction path.
Ahrefs' backlink data is still the industry benchmark.
Weaknesses
Priced as a bolt-on — you're paying $179+ minimum (Ahrefs Lite + Brand Radar entry).
Slower to add AI-specific features than category specialists.
Verdict
The convenience option for Ahrefs loyalists. If you don't already use Ahrefs, this isn't the entry point — you'd be paying enterprise money for a bolted-on feature. If you do use Ahrefs, it's the least-disruptive way to add AI visibility to your existing workflow.
Disclosure: Outerank is our own tool, ranked at #3. We could have put ourselves at #1 — most category articles do — but that's not the honest editorial call for the narrow question "best AI-search dashboard." Specialists like Profound and AthenaHQ genuinely lead there. Where Outerank wins is the combined SEO + AI-search workflow at one price, which we make the case for in the verdict.
Running an agency? See how our white-label SEO reports deliver monthly client reports at scale — 50 projects, full white-label, from $199/mo.
ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews drive the most measurable traffic today. Perplexity is closing fast and tends to over-index for research queries. Gemini and Copilot are worth tracking as leading indicators but shouldn't drive tool selection.
Do I need an AI-visibility tool if I'm already ranking well in Google?
Increasingly, yes. AI Overviews reduce click-through rates on informational queries by 20–40% depending on category. If your traffic model depends on organic clicks, tracking whether AI answers cite you is now a leading indicator of future revenue.
Can I just use ChatGPT to check my own visibility?
For one query, sure. For monitoring across dozens of prompts, engines, and languages over weeks — no. That's what these tools automate. The value is in the tracking, not the single query.
How is this list ordered?
By our editorial call for the specific question "best AI-search visibility tool" — depth for enterprise (Profound), polish for teams (AthenaHQ), consolidated stack for founders/agencies (Outerank), and specialists by price/breadth after that.
Try Outerank free
Free plan forever · 7-day trial on paid plans · cancel any time.